Pre-production MVPEVM-first · Chain-agnostic · Production network not selectedProduct status

Use Case / Commodities

Follow physical inventory through provenance and custody.

Inventory records, provenance and custody events for physical assets.

USE-CASE MATURITYARCHITECTURE USE CASE

Novera architecture has been mapped conceptually to the use case, but this is not a production product or deployment.

Configures the same primitives
  • NovaIDMVP MOCK
  • NovaRegistryMVP
  • NovaDeedMVP MOCK
How maturity is defined

01 · The coordination problem

Many systems. One asset state.

A commodity's value depends on where it came from, its grade, where it is held and who controls it—information held by producers, warehouses, inspectors, carriers and buyers.

Novera's architecture could keep inventory state, provenance and custody events coherent across those parties, without operating markets or custody.

INVENTORY LOTPROVENANCE · CUSTODY CHAINWAREHOUSEBUYERINSPECTION
ABSTRACT MODELAn inventory-lot record referencing origin, grade and location.

02 · Participants

Who takes part—and who stays authoritative.

  • Producer / owner

    The lot's origin information and ownership claims.

  • Warehouse operatorExternal authority

    Physical custody and warehouse receipts.

  • Inspector / assayerExternal authority

    Quality and quantity determinations.

  • CarrierExternal authority

    Custody while in transit.

  • Buyer

    Acceptance and their own payment decisions.

04 · State to coordinate

Six stages. State accumulates around the asset.

Step through the same Novera lifecycle used by every asset class. Each stage names the primitive involved and where Novera stops.

INVENTORY LOTPROVENANCE · CUSTODY CHAINWAREHOUSEBUYERINSPECTION
  • IdentityOwner, custodian and inspector state
STAGE 01 / 06 · NovaID

Owner and custodians are represented

NovaID could reference producer, warehouse and inspector participant state.

Who is participating?

Boundary Does not independently perform regulated identity verification.

Conceptual model · Visitor-controlled · No live data

Signature workflow

A custody chain, not a market.

The events a coordination layer would follow as a lot moves from origin to buyer.

  1. 01Origin

    Lot produced; origin and grade references attached.

  2. 02Warehousing

    Warehouse receipt referenced; custodian state recorded.

  3. 03Inspection

    An external inspection outcome is referenced.

  4. 04Transfer

    The ownership-transfer workflow is recorded.

  5. 05Release

    Release conditions met; custody passes to the carrier.

  6. 06Delivery

    Buyer receipt referenced; payment finalizes externally.

06 · 07 · 08 · Policy, evidence, settlement

Rules, proof and the final boundary.

06 · POLICY CONDITIONS

What rules may apply

  • Origin and sourcing requirements
  • Quality and grade thresholds
  • Release and transfer authorization
  • Jurisdiction-dependent requirements

Represented as workflow conditions—not legal or regulatory determinations.

07 · EVIDENCE

What supports each transition

  • Warehouse-receipt references
  • Inspection and assay certificate references
  • Custody hand-off events
  • Transport-document references

Referenced from its source, not certified by Novera.

08 · SETTLEMENT INTERFACE

Where Novera stops

Payment and delivery finalize through buyers', sellers' and warehouses' systems and any exchange or clearing arrangements.

Handled externally by
Warehouses, payment providers, exchange and clearing venues
UNDER EVALUATION

09 · What Novera does not replace

Coordinate state. Preserve the authority.

Novera does not operate commodity markets, warehouses or custody infrastructure.

  • REMAINS AUTHORITATIVECommodity markets and exchanges
  • REMAINS AUTHORITATIVEWarehouse operators and custodians
  • REMAINS AUTHORITATIVEInspection and assay bodies
  • REMAINS AUTHORITATIVEPayment providers
10 · MATURITYARCHITECTURE USE CASE

Mapped conceptually · not a product or deployment.

Different assets · One control layer

The asset changes. The architecture remains.

Compare how the same primitives map to other asset lifecycles, or review the architecture behind them.